global warming the pacific islands top issue for 2008
0
comments
at
14:46
pacific islander of the year 2007
0
comments
at
15:02
transparency papua responds to concerns
NEWS Transparency International in Papua New Guinea has agreed that allegations of conflicts of interest among country reports authors may be a concern. "Of course TI is against anyone writing in its name who has a conflict of interest," says PNG TI chairman Mike Manning in a response to questions. Manning goes on to state that because there is only one allegation, this "means that the rest do not have such conflict." STRUGGLING Manning also states that Transparency International in Papua New Guinea is "an NGO struggling for our existence." PNG TI is "sensitive to criticism and try to take on board any suggestions that will improve our performance. But we are an NGO, we have limited funds, a few dedicated staff who are flat out holding our heads above water and the task is limitless as well as thankless." He recommended seeking comment to Dr Peter Larmour at the Australia National University, which commissioned country reports on the Pacific Islands. FIRST His is the first - and so far the only - response from a national chapter to questions over the concerns about conflicts of interest among authors of country reports. Daily newspaper Cook Islands News first raised the issue in 2004, when it published a story about that year's country report. In the newspaper story, it was pointed out that the report was authored by the sister of a man who was chief negotiator for the then Sheraton Hotel project, in what became the country's biggest corruption scandal. The scandal was not mentioned once in the country report, which instead blamed problems on "traditional attitudes." ANOTHER CONFLICT Follow up questions sent by Avaiki News Agency got no response from Transparency International, despite three or so attempts over the last three years. A report co-author was also identified as having conflicts of interest, having acted as a commissioner for the country's offshore banking industry, suspected of secretly funding political parties and other corrupt practices. Finally, earlier this month, questions were sent to more than 90 national chapters outlining the allegations. GLARING GAPS Deep conflicts of interest and glaring gaps in country reports would seem to be allegations of concern to an organisation concerning itself with attacking corruption. However, the lack of response risks leaving an impression that Transparency International is less than transparent when it comes to its own affairs. Following is the response from PNG chairman Mike Manning, in full. MIKE MANNING RESPONSE "Dear Jason, "I have voted in your survey and want to make a couple of points. "1. The fact that only one of a number of reports is alleged to be written by someone with a conflict of interest means that the rest do not have such conflict. "2. Of course TI is against anyone writing in its name who has a conflict of interest and you query should be to Dr Peter Larmour at the ANU who coordinated the project rather than TI which can hardly be expected to vet the names of all persons involved in a project and even less to be able to conduct a fit and proper persons test on them. We are, after all, an NGO struggling for our existence. "3. Your website implies that we do not try to keep our house in order or look critically at all aspects of our work. Let me assure you that TIPNG has an annual strategy session where we do exactly that, analyse our past performance, what we achieved and what failures we have had. "From there we plan our net five year rolling plan and next year's activities. We are sensitive to criticism and try to take on board any suggestions that will improve our performance. But we are an NGO, we have limited funds, a few dedicated staff who are flat out holding our heads above water and the task is limitless as well as thankless. "Yours sincerely, "Mike Manning" Michael Manning OL, OBE Mirel Ltd PO Box 1428, Kokopo, ENB PAPUA NEW GUINEA PH/Fax: 9829428 Mobile 6903798
0
comments
at
14:15
journalist death still poses questions, 10 years on
New Zealand's main daily paper, the New Zealand Herald, has published a rare article on the Pacific Islands, in this case regarding the tenth anniversary of a journalist killed in French Polynesia.
"It has all the hallmarks of a spy thriller. The setting is the idyllic South Pacific island of Tahiti and the plot concerns a journalist who knows too much, and is drowned by government agents.His wife, who is having an affair with his friend, readily accepts the death was a suicide."The report was filed by the Australian Associated Press, and is only the second article by the New Zealand Herald on Couraud, the first last being back in November 2004. read more digg story
0
comments
at
13:59
google hijacked by linguistic terrorism
1 comments
at
10:15
take a sledgehammer to human rights abuses
In 1986, Peter Gabriel took his "Sledgehammer" to pop music, smashing his old band mates Gensis and their "Invisible Touch" right off the top of the charts. In 2002, Gabriel co-founded WITNESS, aimed at smashing secrecy over human rights abuses. In 2004, he eventually turned down an idea of retouring with Genesis. Now he has a new sledgehammer: The Hub. Conceived as a safety vault for video of human rights, the Hub offers independence from corporate correctness. One recent example: YouTube suspending access to video footage shot by Egyptian police officers. Using mobile phones to film colleagues beating a suspect, the clips were leaked to the web by Wael Abbas and other Egptian human rights bloggers. Notes the Hub:"They're so graphic that YouTube temporarily shut down Abbas' channel. It's now back up - but shows the importance of a place like the Hub to house this material in context." Official agenda: The Hub is "a global platform for human rights media and action, including video, audio and photos related to violations of human rights of all kinds, whether they be political, civil, social, economic or cultural rights." Importance to the Pacific: Ask anyone in East Timor, Papua, Papua New Guinea, Bougainville, Solomon Islands, Marshall Islands, Tonga, Samoa, Kiribati, Hawai'i, Rapa Nui and French Polynesia about human rights abuses - guesstimated cases number in the tens if not hundreds of thousands - including legacy issues from colonial and nuclear corruption. Importance to human rights: the Hub is one of a small but fast growing number of organisations recognising media centrality to solving human rights and other issues. read more digg story
0
comments
at
14:53
head-slap astonishing: fusimalohi forever!
NEWS COMMENT
by jason brown, editor, avaiki nius agency
DEATH STAR
NEWS - OR PR?
As is common across the world, death brings forgiveness.
Pacific Islands are no different, nor, apparently, are regional media.
Famous for spicy, free-for-all debates across the defamation spectrum, Pacific Islands journalists roll over like roti, soggy and oily ones, when there is a death in the media family.
DEATH STAR
Such was the early evidence this week, with plaudits piling in for one-time broadcasting chief and latter-day reform convert, Tavake Fusimalohi.
For most of his long career, Fusimalohi was rabidly apologist for the ruling monarchy in the Kingdom of Tonga. Many memories of him at regional media bashes are closer to Death Star than Media Star.
Even so, journalists like long-time trainer Peter Lomas wrote a glowing letter, rather than a fair and balanced report about the Tongan tyro.
So, is it important for islands media to maintain cool distance - palagi style, perhaps - assessing the legacy of those who pass on in the Pacific Islands?
NEWS - OR PR?
Anything less suggests public relations, not new That was the stance taken earlier this year by online news agency Matangi Tonga.
They rejected a story about Fusimalohi supposedly gaining a regional media award, the Pacific Islands News Association's Freedom of Information Award.
Not news they said. And it wasn't - not accurate news anyway.
PINA flip-flopped a couple of times, finally settling on the explanation that the award given to Fusimalohi was from the Media Association of Solomon Islands. Not the PINA award.
FUSIMALOHI FOREVER
All this might be less newsworthy if it were not for PINA now marking Fusimalohi's death by renaming the award.
Showing even less concern for due process, PINA executives have allegedly renamed the FOI award as the Tavakae Fusimalohi Award.
Forever. Apparently.
With no future reference to either freedom or information.
HEAD SLAP
Head-slapping silliness. Yes, Fusimalohi was arrested by Tongan authorities for sedition and criminal defamation.
Yes, Fusimalohi has been lauded by much bigger news sources than this agency, witness a glowing tribute from the Fiji Times with quotes about a "fearless crusading journalist."
But bigness is no guarantee of success - witness the sorry state of PINA itself.
Also far from clear is whether Fusimalohi really was challenging the status quo, or trying a variation of long-standing attempts to drag independent news media into controversy and disrepute.
FALSE POSITIVES
Interesting to note, then, that in Fusimalohi's homeland, Matangi Tonga appears to stand by its earlier stance, reporting the death of Fusimalohi in four, short sentences. Not the complete picture, either, but at least it's not a falsely positive picture.
Let us spell this out: PINA is ignoring existing controversy over lack of proper due process in seeking nominations and selecting a Freedom of Information award winner.
Changing the name only adds insult to injury.
CREDIBILITY BLEED
None of this celebrates Fusimalohi or leaves much room for discussion about any good parts of his legacy. If anything, it merely adds to the "embarrassment" already alluded to by Matangi Tonga.
More importantly, statements by the new PINA executive assume a mandate they do not have. The FOI is part of a proud tradition stretching back three decades to recognise media who sacrificed plenty in their outspoken support of freedoms of information.
By contrast, Fusimalohi sacrificed little and gained much from his time in the media world. PINA disrespects earlier award winners by lavishing him with this incredible honour.
WHAT NEXT?
This agency will forward this editorial for comment from PINA. Earlier emails have been ignored so far.
We have established a month-long poll to see whether regional media agree with the new name for the PINA award.
Finally, the agency will suggest ways for PINA to be more transparent, accountable and consultative with the industry.
Also news this week: PINA partnering with the Forum Secretariat. Hopefully, a sign that good governance is as important in the media as anywhere else.
. . .
0
comments
at
23:55

